Some are more equal than others
Friday, July 8th, 2005There are actually two faces to acts of terror. One which gets enacted in American and UK soils and the version which gets executed in places like Kashmir.
Readers may be wondering “what the heck, its precious human lives after all, right?”. Blame it on their naivette. Its never that simple to an average westerner or western media.
Remember friends, there is one fundamental philosophy which goes like this, “All people are equal but some are more equal than others”.
Western media finds acts like 9/11 as “an attack on our freedom of thought, our democracy, and our culture”. But it is never so clear when it happens in Kashmir. Or when an Indian flight gets hijacked to Kandhahar.
Western media, with due respect to their professionalism, will not have second thoughts in calling Kashmir as “Indian occupied Kashmir” and even say that all the atrocities that had happened were because of “excesses” by our security forces. Terrorists in Kashmir are “freedom fighters”, mind you. Not very different from Musharraf’s version.
How many times have we seen high level diplomats from that bloody America express their concern about “Human rights violation” in Kashmir? Have any of these US diplomats or any other developed nation or media has ever talked about the plight of Kashmiri Pandit community? Apparently, they are the least equals of the lot. Right at the bottom of preference for justice and fairness.
But their tone always seems to be “Now don’t talk about Abu Ghraib ok? Prisoners are getting treated in the “bestest, fairest” possible way. All the pictures you see are fakes. Just like our President’s photographs with turkey during Thanksgiving Day”
And we, the third worlders should rest in the belief that only 9/11 and now London are “the most barbaric acts in the history of mankind”.
Can anyone remind them that far too many 9/11s occured in Kashmir, Punjab and Srilanka for far too long for us to care and count?
Why is that any dastardly act is given a color of freedom struggle if it happens in Kashmir and terrorism if it happens in US and Uk?
Thee are reasons friends. Violence in Kashmir, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan or Sri Lanka leads to a surge in demand for weapons. Which means weapons manufacturers in the western world can laugh all the way to their banks. But what about innocents moved out of their homes and left starving? “No problem, we can throw them food packets from air crafts with our flag in the cover and its a fantatsic view to see starving people fighting for those packets at ground level like street dogs you know?” seems to be the response by US and UK governments in deed, if not in words.
To my mind, UK citizens are now paying the price for being an accomplice to that ultimate symbol of universal peace, love and brotherhood - US government and its foreign policy.
Note:
Amidst all this western bashing, let us take this opportunity to appreciate the efforts taken by Scandinavian countries, particularly Norway in trying to bring peace to Sri Lanka.
It should also be remembered that there exists one continent which goes by the name of Africa and it hardly ever gets covered in any media, for obvious reasons.