A remarkable James Bond film with a touch of David Copperfield.
The basic reason why someone would make a movie is when he has a compelling story to say. Here the primary reason why this movie was made is because the guy had to be there in every single shot. He had a producer who could spend like Tsunami and a top notch technical crew to back him and so this movie.
I mean I can see the hero’s effort and suffering and all that in doing ten roles. But tell me the frickin reason why he had to do ten roles? And why not the parts essayed by Santhana Bharathi or P Vasu or for that matter, Asin?
Probably he had solved this like he would an operation research problem. Minimizing for the constraint of presence in every shot for the given screenplay would’ve given him an answer of at least ten roles. And so he did ten roles. The rule of thumb is like this: If you cannot recognize some face in the movie, you know who it is!
Somewhere in the title, some one gets credit for story.That was meant to be a joke. Don’t get fooled by that. If you know Mahavishnu the saviour and Tsunami you have the story.
The screenplay moves at break neck speed leaving you with no time to think. And thats the biggest plus point of the film. Thats why after all the fuss and blog posts like this, the movie is very watchable.
But alas a fast screenplay does not a great movie make. And this movie could’ve easily been a great movie if only he had cut at least five characters, given the characters some more depth, attemped a reason as to why those had to be done by the same person and made the screenplay a bit more realistic.
I could sense dialogues right at the end - “Naan kadavul illai nu sollave illai.. Kadavul Irundhirundha innum nalla irukume nu sonnen…” But some other dialogues are more statements from the actor the person than dialogues from characters.
Among the characters, Balram Naidu and Rangaraja Nambi stand out. I could feel bhakti and defiance when Hariharan renders “Om Namo Narayananaaaya” in the background. The humor in Balram Naidu makes him likeable.
The expressions when Vincent Bhuvaraghavan and Rangaraja Nambi drown is just top class. The details to body language and dialogue delivery are all spot on. He is not what he is without those. But we know about those ever since the days of Velu Nayakkar some twenty years back. I don’t want to praise a movie because the actor had great attention to details or can endure six hours of make-up. It should cascade down from the characters which in turn should derive from the story. Without those it looks the idea is not very different from the way K Bhagyaraj took stills like Vakeel, Doctor and graduate in ‘Rasukutti’.
Nevertheless its a remarkable movie from a technical standpoint. The first and last thirty minutes of the movie HAD to be watched in wide screen. Forget Tubetamil. Three or more characters performed by the same actor in a single scene never looked this natural in my knowledge. This is a landmark film in that sense.
Kudos to the entire technical crew for bringing to life a movie like this. And if at all this movie fails, very unlikely given the way the audience watched open-mouthed the rolling credits with the actors’ make-up et al, you know whom to blame.
And oh yeah, its N times better than last year’s Shanker’s debacle of a movie or the more recent Indiana Jones. Its another matter that comparing with films like that is a deserving insult.